← EFTA02745994Court RecordsEFTA02746004 →

EFTA02745999

Court Records

Extracted Text #

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 253 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/07/2009 Page 1 of 5 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
JANE DOE NO. 2, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
JANE DOE NO. 3, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA 
CASE NO.: 013-CV-80232-MARRA 
/ 
JANE DOE NO. 4, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
JANE DOE NO. 5, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA, 
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA/ 
1 
EFTA02745999

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 253 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/07/2009 Page 2 of 5 
Defendant. 
JANE DOE NO. 6, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
CASE NO.: 08-80994-CIV-MARRA 
JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08-80993-CIV-MARRA 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-8081 I-CIV-MARRA 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08- 80893-CIV-MARRA/ 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, 
2 
EFTA02746000

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 253 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/07/2009 Page 3 of 5 
Defendants. 
/ 
DOE II, CASE NO.: 09- 80469-CIV-MARRA/
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, 
Defendants. 
/ 
JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.: 09- 80591-CIV-MARRAi 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
/ 
JANE DOE NO. 102 CASE NO.: 09- 80656-CIV-MARRAi 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
/ 
ORDER 
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Defendant" or 
"Epstein")'s Motions to Compel and/or Identify Jane Doe in the Style of this Case and Motion to 
3 
EFTA02746001

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 253 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/07/2009 Page 4 of 5 
Identify Doe in Third-Party Subpoenas for Purposes of Discovery, or Alternatively Motion to 
Dismiss (DE 65 in 08-80119). The Court has reviewed the motions, responses, and replies, and 
is otherwise fully advised in the premesis. 
Plaintiffs filed their respective suits under a pseudonym (although Defendant and his 
counsel are aware of Plaintiffs' legal names) to prevent public disclosure of private, intimate facts 
pertaining to their alleged sexual abuse and exploitation by Defendant when they were minors. 
Plaintiffs claim that public disclosure of their legal names would create a substantial risk to them 
of further psychological harm. 
Defendant argues that the purpose of his motion to identify is to obtain discovery related 
to the allegations in Plaintiffs' respective complaints and to properly defend and investigate the 
matters that have been filed against him. Defendant claims that Plaintiffs "gather together in a 
continued effort to stonewall and prevent discovery of their past medical, psychological and 
employment histories." (DE 247 at 4). 
Defendant states that he will withdraw his request for Plaintiffs to be identified in the 
styles of their respective cases if he is permitted to conduct the necessary and regular discovery 
related to Plaintiffs' allegations in their complaints. (DE 247 at 5-6). Defendant argues that 
failure to allow him discovery is severely prejudicing him. 
The Court agrees that Defendant is entitled to discovery relating to the allegations in 
Plaintiffs' complaints. However, it also acknowleges Plaintiffs concerns regarding public 
disclosure of their legal names. Accordingly, it is hereby 
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Motions to Compel and/or Identify Jane Doe in the 
Style of this Case and Motion to Identify Doe in Third-Party Subpoenas for Purposes of 
4 
EFTA02746002

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 253 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/07/2009 Page 5 of 5 
Discovery, or Alternatively Motion to Dismiss (DE 65 in 08-80119) are GRANTED IN PART 
AND DENIED IN PART as follows: Based upon Defendant's agreement, the plaintiffs need not 
be identified by their legal names in the styles of these cases. As to third party discovery, 
Defendant shall style any subpoenas to third parties for documents or depositions with the case 
number and style "In Re [plaintiff's legal name]." Further, the subpoenas to third parties shall 
not make reference to or identify Defendant by name. Defendant's alternative motion to dismiss 
sua spouse is denied. 
DONE AND ORDERED in at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, 
Florida, this r day of August, 2009 
KENNETH A. MARRA 
United States District Judge 
Copies furnished to: 
all counsel of record 
5 
EFTA02746003
← EFTA02745994Court RecordsEFTA02746004 →