EFTA02745618

Extracted Text #

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 238 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/31/2009 Page 1 of 5 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
JANE DOE NO. 2, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
JANE DOE NO. 3, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA 
CASE NO.: 013-CV-80232-MARRA 
/ 
JANE DOE NO. 4, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
JANE DOE NO. 5, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA 
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA 
1 
EFTA02745618

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 238 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/31/2009 Page 2 of 5 
Defendant. 
JANE DOE NO. 6, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
JANE DOE NO. 7, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
CASE NO.: 08-80994-CIV-MARRA 
CASE NO.: 08-80993-CIV-MARRA 
C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-80811-CIV-MARRA/ 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08- 80893-CIV-MARRA/ 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, 
2 
EFTA02745619

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 238 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/31/2009 Page 3 of 5 
Defendants. 
/ 
DOE II, CASE NO.: 09- 80469-CIV-MARRA1
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, 
Defendants. 
/ 
JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.: 09- 80591-CTV-MARRa 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
/ 
JANE DOE NO. 102 CASE NO.: 09- 80656-CIV-MARRa 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
/ 
ORDER 
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs Jane Doe. No 101 and IO2's Motion for 
No-Contact Order (DE 113) and Plaintiffs Jane Does' 2-7 Notice of Joinder in Plaintiffs' Motion 
(DE 145). The Court has reviewed the motions, responses, and replies (DE's 113, 127, 136, 145, 
3 
EFTA02745620

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 238 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/31/2009 Page 4 of 5 
233), and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. Plaintiffs seek a Court order prohibiting 
Defendant or his agents from communicating with Plaintiffs directly or indirectly. Defendant. 
Defendant opposes the request as "needless, unwarranted and excessive." (DE 127 at 5). 
Nonetheless, Defendant states in his response that "neither Mr. Epstein nor his attorneys, nor 
their agents intend to have any direct or indirect contact with Plaintiffs counsels' clients." (DE 
127 at 4). 
The Court notes that Defendant is already under court order not to have direct or indirect 
contact with any victims. See Transcript of Plea Conference at 20. During the course of 
Defendant's state plea conference of June 30, 2009, Palm Beach Circuit Court Judge Deborah 
Dale Pucillio explicitly instructed Defendant as follows: 
Court: Okay. D is, you shall not have any contact with the victim, are there more 
than one victim? 
Ms. Belohlavek: There's several. 
Court: Several, all of the victims. So this should be plural. I'm making that 
plural. You are not to have any contact direct or indirect, and in this day and age I 
find it necessary to go over exactly what we mean by indirect. By indirect, we 
mean no text messages, no e-mail, no Face Book, no My Space, no telephone 
calls, no voice mails, no messages through carrier pigeon, no messages through 
third parties, no hey would you tell so and so for me, no having a friend, 
acquaintance or stranger approach any of these victims with a message of any sort 
from you, is that clear? 
Defendant: Yes, 
Id. at 20-21. 
In light of Defendant's response to Plaintiffs' motion for no contact order, suggesting that 
the state court's order only applies to some victims and that panics are always allowed to contact 
each other directly, the Court finds it necessary to state clearly that Defendant is under this 
4 
EFTA02745621

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 238 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/31/2009 Page 5 of 5 
court's order not to have direct or indirect contact with any plaintiffs, regardless of the intended 
scope of the state court's order. Accordingly, it is hereby 
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: Plaintiffs Jane Doe. No 101 and 102's 
Motion for No-Contact Order (DE 113) is GRANTED. Defendant is hereby prohibited from 
communicating with all plaintiffs directly or indirectly', either personally or through agents, 
except that Defendant may communicate with plaintiffs only through plaintiffs' attorneys of 
record, for the duration of this Order. 
DONE AND ORDERED in at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, 
Florida, this 31m day of July, 2009 
KENNETH A. MARRA 
United States District Judge 
Copies furnished to: 
all counsel of record 
'See infra, excerpt of Transcript of Plea Conference at 20-21, for examples of indirect 
contact. 
5 
EFTA02745622