← EFTA02745452Court RecordsEFTA02745465 →

EFTA02745460

Court Records

Extracted Text #

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 223-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/29/2009 Page 1 of 5 
The Psychological Trauma Center 
a division of Preventive Psychiatry Associates Medical Group, inc. 
Medical Director: Gilbert W. Kliman, M. D. 
2105 Divisadcro St., San Francisco, CA 94115 
Phone ([Phone Redacted] Fax ([Phone Redacted] 
www.epridaor rajggysty0 
Forensic Child Psychiatric Evaluations. Life Care Plans & Testimony 
DECLARATION OF GILBERT KLIMAN, M. D. 
June 4, 2009 
RE: EXPECTATION OF HARM FROM DISCLOSING THE PLAINTIFFS' IDENTITIES 
IN DOES V JEFFREY EPSTEIN 
1. I, Gilbert W. Kliman, M.D., of 2105 Divisadero Street, San Francisco, California, 
CA. Physicians License G55912, declare the following under penalty of perjury: 
2. I have been retained by plaintiffs' law firm, Mermelstein & Horowitz, to give expert 
testimony. If called as a witness, I would testify truthfully and competently concerning 
my psychiatric findings about each of the plaintiffs' alleged experiences of sexual abuse, 
and the enduring effects that I fmd each of the young women have suffered as a direct 
result of the sexual acts perpetrated by the defendant. 
3. I have been asked to respond to the Defense motion, which requests that some of the 
plaintiffs, who are now adults, should be publicly named. It is my opinion that 
involuntary public disclosure will result in the plaintiffs experiencing revictimization, 
albeit by a justice system that is designed to protect them. If their identities are released, 
the victims will be at-risk of having their personal lives scrutinized by friends, extended 
family, spouses, children, fellow students, employers and fellow employees, the media 
and general public. This type of exposure humiliates many victims and represents another 
betrayal of trust. Public exposure places the plaintiffs at further risk of stigmatization, 
shame and retraumatization. 
4. Due to traumatization the plaintiffs are arrested in their development, and even those 
who are now legally adults are arrested in part to adolescent aspects of psychology. 
5. The plaintiffs do not hold their heads high with pride for having been sexually 
controlled by Mr. Epstein. They hold their heads low with shame. The internal life of a 
typical adolescent, into late adolescence and early adult years in the best of 
circumstances, usually involves generous proportions of self-consciousness, shame, self-
absorption and self-doubt and self-blame about sexual acts. 
EXHIBIT 1 
Lt
EFTA02745460

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 223-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/29/2009 Page 2 of 5 
6. Clinically harmful levels of shame, self-consciousness, self-doubt and self-blame are 
even more prominent among victims of molestations than among the general population. 
7. Molested teenagers are particularly vulnerable to wrongful manipulations and special 
clinical harms from the experiences of shame and humiliation. In fact, shame and efforts 
to cope with it played an underlying role in the harm to each plaintiff. Each was lured 
into Mr. Epstein's sexual lair with the promise of overcoming bodily and sexual shame 
by earning money and bettering their lot in life. The defendant capitalized on their sexual 
naiveté, insecurities and effort to better themselves, and he worked hard to overcome 
their shame at his enlistment of them in his selfish gratifications. 
8. The defendant who wishes to make their identities public is one whom the criminal 
justice system has already determined is a person who has already committed a crime of 
child molestation. That surely means he has already exploited and manipulated the girls' 
state of adolescent sexuality, including their embarrassment, awkwardness and bodily 
self-consciousness. He perverted their nascent and developing moral structures by posing 
as a generous, avuncular mentor who could coach them about their bodies, sex and love. 
The exploitation of adolescent bodies, sex and love is — from a psychoanalytic point of 
view an influence on the developing moral conscience of the children, as well as on 
their sexual urges. Now the ravaging of their internal and private moral conscience is 
intended by the perpetrator to be made a public ravaging. 
9. Among sexual trauma victims, the insidious and destructive persistencelire,
humiliationand associated self-blame is well-documented (Finkclhor and 1985). 
Stigmatization, as experienced by a sexual trauma victim, has especially painful and 
pathologic consequences. Shame lingers and becomes integrated within the adolescent 
victim's malleable emerging identity, character structure and self image. Moral clarity is 
distorted. Perceptions of self-blame and guilt are magnified. The impact of shame lends 
to cultivating a self image of being "spoiled goods." 
10. Stigmatization following sexual trauma results in long-term risks that can negatively 
shape multiple facets of adult development: sexual, emotional, interpersonal and 
vocational. Stigmatization, which is generally to be avoided among psychiatric patients, 
increases risks among those — as in our plaintiffs as a group — who experience clinical 
depression and self-destructive behaviors: drug use, criminal activity, even prostitution. 
Stigmatization following abuse is associated with delinquency due to increased anger 
and affiliation with deviant peers (Feiring et al., 2007). 
11. Shame and guilt are important dimensions of both complex and single event, 
posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Symptoms of shame are associated with feelings of 
helplessness and powerlessness, which each of the plaintiffs endorsed experiencing in 
relation to Mr. Epstein. 
EFTA02745461

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 223-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/29/2009 Page 3 of 5 
12. The DSM-IV-TR recognizes both powerlessness and helplessness as requisite parts of 
the traumatic experience in Criterion A for the diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder 
trauma ( Seligman, recent Past President of the American Psychological 
Association, coined relevant terms of "learned helplessness and "Loss of Personal Locus 
of Control." See Seligman, M.P. 1975: Helplessness, Depression, Development and 
Death. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco). The teenaged girls suffered the loss of personal 
locus of control to a much more experienced, sexually aggressive, powerful and 
dominant, manipulative perpetrator. 
13. Releasing names of the plaintiffs to the public will reenact experiences of 
powerlessness and helplessness in the face of a boundary violation. Repetition and 
reenactment represent central features of Criterion B in the DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of 
posttraumatic stress disorder trauma. In effect, release of their identity and public 
intrusion into their personal life represents a reenactment of the shame of sexual 
traumatization. Repetition and reenactment are central pathologies that afflict sexual 
trauma survivors. 
14. Victims of sexual abuse often rely upon some form of dissociation, splitting or denial, 
as a defensive means to manage overwhelming affects associated with the sexual trauma. 
Each of the plaintiff girls has employed some variation of this defense, both during the 
massages and then subsequently following disclosure of the abuse. Primitive, 
maladaptive responses of this nature will become additionally reinforced as a result of 
public disclosure. 
15. Another aspect of the plaintiffs' experience, which is recognized by DSM-IV-TR, is 
that the trauma was associated with human design factors (such as cruel intention to do 
harm, rape, torture). Trauma of this origin has a tendency to produce more "severe or 
long lasting" posttraumatic stress disorder than natural events (DSM IV TR p. 464). A 
policy of deliberate revelation of the names of the victims would reinforce the sense of 
design, pattern and policy of human intentions. 
16. Negative expectations about significant activities are noted in DSM-IV-TR, as part of 
Criterion C. Symptoms of foreshortened future are characteristic of a traumatized 
individual's clinical course (C4). They expect revictimization. They expect bad outcomes 
(C7) in their social, educational, vocational, relational plans. They are hypervigilant 
(Criterion D4) for further trauma, and this affects lifestyle choices and future planning. 
Hypervigilance is part of the arousal set of criteria. Public disclosure of the victims' 
identity will aggravate existing symptoms of hypervigilance. 
17. The DSM-IV-TR diagnostic category of "chronic" is justified for each of the 
plaintiffs. Scientific literature shows that the prognostic consequences of PTSD and 
residual effects may last for decades (U.S. Dept. of Health, 2005; Issues in Child Abuse 
Prevention Number 9 Autumn] 998: Long-term Effects of Child Sexual Abuse, Paul E 
Mullen and Jillian Fleming). The lasting impact upon character, identity and moral 
development will probably affect long-term influences upon adult development. It is 
more probable than not that stigmatization associated with public disclosure of the 
3 
EFTA02745462

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 223-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/29/2009 Page 4 of 5 
plaintiffs' identities will intensify the scope, nature and severity of the chronic symptom 
course. 
18. In addition to PTSD, shame and humiliation themselves have also been associated 
with causing clinical depression. Coexisting PTSD and clinical depression places the 
plaintiff's at increased risk for re-victimization and high risk sexual behaviors (e.g., 
sexually transmitted disease, premature pregnancy, rape) (Nelson, 2002), and at greater 
risk to victimize others (Filipas and Ullman, 2006; Desai, Centers for Disease Control, 
2002) who are in their control. Studies have also shown that chronic symptoms of PTSD, 
in association with a single episode of Major Depressive Disorder, can produce lifetime 
adjustment difficulties, which include suicidality (Oquendo et al, 2005; Dube et al, CDC, 
2001; Rohde, J. Am. Acad. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 2005). The plaintiffs will be 
additionally vulnerable to these clinical outcomes, if they suffer the stigmatization and 
humiliation associated with public disclosure of their identities. 
19. Alternative hypothesis: I have applied the evidence shown from examination and 
testing of the plaintiffs and relevant observations and information from other 
professionals while testing an alternative hypothesis: that no harm would result from 
public disclosure of the plaintiffs' identities. During the evaluations with the six 
plaintiffs, I used generally acceptable criteria for establishing whether a DSM-IV-TR 
disorder occurred. I established that there were provable and diagnosable injuries, 
primarily posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbid depression. Based upon these 
diagnostic signs, it is more probable than not, that exposing the plaintiff's identity to the 
public is not a trivial concern or one without substantial clinical repercussions. I believe 
that most child, adolescent and adult psychiatrists would share the opinion that additional 
psychiatric injury will result from such exposure. 
20. However, consider for the sake of argument, that my diagnostic conclusions are 
incorrect, notwithstanding having fulfilled standard psychiatric evaluation procedures of 
taking a history from multiple sources, videotaping and transcribing my initial interview, 
and reviewing available medical and legal documents. Even if this was the case, and my 
diagnostic conclusions were faulty, I believe that multiple experts, even those who may 
now propose publication of the victims' names, would still come to a conclusion that the 
plaintiffs suffered sexual abuse, and in some cases, multiple acts of ongoing abuse, at the 
hands of Jeffery Epstein. Even without developing a subsequent disorder, there is much 
clinical evidence and scientific literature showing likelihood of substantial psychiatric 
harm to these sexually abused plaintiffs. 
21. To form these conclusions, I have used my extensive experience in forming these 
opinions. That experience is both as a treating child psychiatrist and separately as a 
forensic psychiatrist. I have treated hundreds of minor patients, as well as additionally 
evaluated hundreds of children and adolescents who have suffered sexual abuse. I have 
made long term followups of many of the children and have treated many adults who 
have been molested as adolescents. It is my opinion, with a reasonably high degree of 
medical certainty that the defense motion to allow public disclosure of the plaintiffs' 
identities is clinically and ethically a wrongful plan. The act of revealing their identities 
against their wishes places the plaintiffs at risk, in the best of circumstances, of suffering 
4 
EFTA02745463

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 223-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/29/2009 Page 5 of 5 
an aggravation of existin diagnostic concerns. It is more probable than not that releasing 
personal identities will n exacerbation and magnification of symptoms lending to 
increased risk of revictimization and retraumatization. 
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the 
foregoing statements are true and correct, and that this declaration was executed at San 
Francisco, California on June 4, 2009. 
Gilbert Klima; M.D. 
Distinguished Life Fellow, American Psychiatric Association 
Senior Fellow, American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Brockman Award Holder, for Distinguished Lifetime Contributions to 
Psychoanalysis and Psychiatry, bestowed by the American College of Psychoanalysis and 
Psychiatry 
LEONID NANHOOKIN Comte 1791115 NOTARY PUBUC•CALIFOCOIA VI 
On a Coign. CV SM ftao t" 
MY Cs. D?. Fit 27, 2012 't 
SloteolCattomlo, City & Coontyol Son Francisco Subscribed one sworn lo Warn Del Mb .Xclay of 4u rani by °W. O be thewed to me on /be 
5 
EFTA02745464
← EFTA02745452Court RecordsEFTA02745465 →