EFTA02745096

Extracted Text #

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2009 Page 1 of 4 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
JANE DOE NO. 2, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
JANE DOE NO. 3, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA 
CASE NO.: 013-CV-80232-MARRA 
/ 
JANE DOE NO. 4, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
JANE DOE NO. 5, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA 
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA/ 
1 
EFTA02745096

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2009 Page 2 of 4 
Defendant. 
JANE DOE NO. 6, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
CASE NO.: 08-80994-CIV-MARRA/M. 
JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08-80993-CIV-MARRA 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-8081 1 -CIV-MARRA 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08- 80893-CIV-MARRA/ 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, 
2 
EFTA02745097

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2009 Page 3 of 4 
Defendants. 
DOE II, CASE NO.: 09- 80469-CIV-MARRA/
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, 
Defendants. 
JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.: 09- 80591-CIV-MARRAi 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
JANE DOE NO. 102 CASE NO.: 09- 80656-CIV-MARRAi 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS JANE DOE NOS. 101 AND 102'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER 
FOR THE PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE 
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 
102's Motion for an Order for the Preservation of Evidence (DE 114), filed May 26, 2009. The 
3 
EFTA02745098

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2009 Page 4 of 4 
motion is fully briefed and ripe for review. See DE's 151, 168. The Court has carefully 
considered the motion, response, and reply, and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. 
The Court intends to GRANT Plaintiffs' motion for an order for the preservation of 
evidence. However, Plaintiffs' proposed order is overly broad. Accordingly, the Court directs 
the parties to attempt to agree upon language for an order directing Defendant to preserve 
evidence and submit an agreed order to the Court no later than July 20, 2009. If the parties 
cannot agree, then each party shall submit a proposed order by the foregoing date. 
In the interim and until further order of the Court, Defendant shall not destroy any 
evidence in his possession, custody, or control that is relevant to these cases or that may lead to 
the discovery of evidence relevant to these cases. 
DONE AND ORDERED in at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, 
Florida, this 6th day of July, 2009 
KENNETH A. MARRA 
United States District Judge 
Copies furnished to: 
all counsel of record 
4 
EFTA02745099