EFTA02742143

Extracted Text #

Case 9:08-cv-80381-KAM Document 90 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/14/2009 Page 1 of 5 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
JANE DOE NO. 2, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
JANE DOE NO. 3, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA 
CASE NO.: 013-CV-80232-MARRA 
/ 
JANE DOE NO. 4, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
JANE DOE NO. 5, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA, 
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA/ 
1 
EFTA02742143

Case 9:08-cv-80381-KAM Document 90 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/14/2009 Page 2 of 5 
Defendant. 
JANE DOE NO. 6, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
JANE DOE NO. 7, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
CASE NO.: 08-80994-CIV-MARRA/M. 
CASE NO.: 08-80993-CIV-MARRA 
C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-8081 I-CIV-MARRA 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08- 80893-CIV-MARRA/ 
Plaintiff, 
VS. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, 
2 
EFTA02742144

Case 9:08-cv-80381-KAM Document 90 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/14/2009 Page 3 of 5 
Defendants. 
DOE II, CASE NO.: 09- 80469-CIV-MARRA/ 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, 
Defendants. 
JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.: 09- 80591-CIV-MARRA j 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
/ 
JANE DOE NO. 102 CASE NO.: 09- 80656-CIV-MARRA 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES FOR PURPOSES OF DISCOVERY AND 
PROCEDURAL MOTIONS THAT RELATE TO MULTIPLE CASES 
THIS CAUSE is before the Court sua spouse. In the interests of judicial economy and 
3 
EFTA02742145

Case 9:08-cv-80381-KAM Document 90 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/14/2009 Page 4 of 5 
efficiency, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 
I. The above-styled cases are hereby CONSOLIDATED for purposes of discovery and 
for procedural motions that relate to multiple cases. 
2. Hereinafter, all motions and other court filings that relate to discovery and all 
procedural motions that relate to multiple cases shall be styled with all of the case names and 
numbers, consistent with the styling of this Order, and shall be FILED ONLY IN Jane Doe No. 
2 v. Epstein, case no. 08-80119, which is the lowest-numbered pending case. Any motions styled 
incorrectly or filed in multiple cases will be stricken from the docket for failure to follow the 
Court's Order. 
3. The parties may file separate motions to dismiss, answers to the complaint, summary 
judgment motions, motions in limine and other substantive motions that pertain to their 
individual cases and their individual trials under their individual case styles. 
4. Production of documents by any party or non-party that relate to multiple cases need 
be produced only once. 
5. Defendant is limited to a single deposition of each Plaintiff, during which Defendant 
may depose the Plaintiff as both a party and a witness. 
6. Defendant(s) may be deposed only once. 
7. Any other witnesses common to multiple cases may be deposed only once. 
8. For depositions, Local Rule 26.1 K (limiting deposition time to one day of seven 
hours) is waived so as to allow each party an adequate opportunity to develop fully the record as 
it may relate to that party. However, this waiver shall not be construed as authority for any party 
to take unnecessarily long depositions, or abuse the process. Any abuses of this waiver 
4 
EFTA02742146

Case 9:08-cv-80381-KAM Document 90 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/14/2009 Page 5 of 5 
shall result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions against the offending party. 
DONE AND ORDERED in at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, 
Florida, this le day of May, 2009 
KENNETH A. MARRA 
United States District Judge 
Copies furnished to: 
all counsel of record 
Magistrate Judge Linnea R. 
5 
EFTA02742147