← EFTA02741513Court RecordsEFTA02741527 →

EFTA02741524

Court Records

Extracted Text #

Case 9:08-cv-80381-KAM Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2008 Page 1 of 3 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA-JOHNSON 
JANE DOE NO. 5, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
 / 
DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION 
TO MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (DE #7 
In accordance with Local Rule 7.1(C), Defendant Jeffrey Epstein submits 
the following response in opposition to Plaintiff's Motion (DE #7) for Judgment 
Upon Default, and respectfully states as follows: 
1. Jeffrey Epstein has filed a motion (DE #9) to set aside the clerk's 
default (DE #6) that would serve as the basis of a default judgment (DE #7-2). 
2. For the reasons detailed in that motion (DE #9 at 3), the clerk's 
default was entered prematurely because substituted service was effected on June 
2, not May 7. Thus, in accordance with Rule 12(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of 
Civil Procedure, Mr. Epstein has until June 23 to respond to the complaint. 
3. Apart from the prematureness of the plaintiffs motion, "[t]he law 
does not favor defaults, and any doubts as to whether a party is in default should be 
EFTA02741524

Case 9:08-cv-80381-KAM Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2008 Page 2 of 3 
decided in favor of the defaulting party." E.g., Marschauser v. Travelers Indent. 
Co., 145 F.R.D. 605, 610 (S.D. Fla. 1992) (Highsmith, J.) (citing 10 Charles A. 
Arthur R. & Mary K. Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure § 
2681 at 402-03 (2d ed. 1983)). Cf id. (noting that "[t]he Court's entry of an Order 
of Default is within the discretion of the Court"). 
4. Because the default (DE 8) was premature, any default judgment at 
this point would also be premature. See Franklin v. Scribner, No. 07cv438 BTM 
(LSP), 2007 WL 2326085, at *1 (S.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2007) (denying motion for 
default judgment where the answer deadline had not yet passed); see also id. 
(characterizing the motion for default judgment as "deficien[t]"). 
WHEREFORE, based on the foregoing, defendant Jeffrey Epstein opposes 
the plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment. 
Respectfully submitted, 
ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & 
WEISS, P.A. 
250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 
Tel: [Phone Redacted] 
Fax: [Phone Redacted] 
By: /s/ Jack A. Goldberger 
Jack A. Goldberger 
Ha. Bar No. 262013 
jgoldberger@ agwpa.com 
Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein 
EFTA02741525

Case 9:08-cv-80381-KAM Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2008 Page 3 of 3 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 19, 2008, I electronically filed the 
foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that 
the foregoing document is being served this day on counsel of record identified 
below by facsimile and U.S. Mail. 
Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. 
Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. 
Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. 
Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 
18205 Biscayne Blvd, Suite 2218 
Miami, Florida 33160 
Fax: [Phone Redacted] 
/s/ Jack A. Goldberger 
Jack A. Goldberger 
EFTA02741526
← EFTA02741513Court RecordsEFTA02741527 →