← EFTA02740423Court RecordsEFTA02740428 →

EFTA02740424

Court Records

Extracted Text #

Case 9:08-cv-80380-KAM Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/10/2008 Page 1 of 4 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA 
JANE DOE NO. 4, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME 
TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY 
Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 4, by and through undersigned counsel, files this Motion for 
Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion for Stay, and states as follows: 
1. Defendant filed his Motion for Stay on June 20, 2008. Plaintiff's response is due on 
or before July 10, 2008. 
2. Defendant's Motion for Stay is based upon the existence of purported parallel 
criminal actions, and is grounded in section 3509(k) of Title 18, United States Code. 
3. Subsequent to filing his Motion for Stay on July 1, 2008, Defendant Epstein filed a 
Notice advising this Court that the State Court criminal action against the Defendant was resolved, 
but that the federal criminal proceeding remained pending. It is Plaintiff's counsel's understanding 
from press reports, however, that the federal criminal proceeding will be resolved in the same plea 
deal, which would make the Defendant's Motion for Stay moot. 
4. Therefore, Plaintiff respectfully requests a brief enlargement of time of twenty (20 
days) within which to file a memorandum in opposition to Defendant's Motion for Stay. This 
- 1 - 
EFTA02740424

Case 9:08-cv-80380-KAM Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/10/2008 Page 2 of 4 
request for enlargement of time is in the interest of judicial economy and efficiency. 
5. Additionally, Plaintiffs counsel requests this enlargement of time due to the demands 
on their time in other cases and matters. 
6. Prior to filing this Motion, Plaintiffs counsel, Adam Horowitz, attempted to confer 
with defense counsel, to no avail. 
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully request that this Court enter an order enlarging by 
twenty (20) days the time within which the Plaintiff may respond to the Defendant's Motion for 
Stay, until July 30, 2008. 
Dated: July 10, 2008. Respectfully submitted, 
By:  s/ Adam D. Horowitz 
Jeffrey M. Herman (FL Bar No. 521647) 
[Email Redacted] 
Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) 
[Email Redacted] 
Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) 
ahorowitz@ hermanlaw.com 
HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A. 
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe 
18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 
Miami, Florida 33160 
Tel: [Phone Redacted] 
Fax: [Phone Redacted] 
' Plaintiff opposes the Motion for Stay on its merits under 18 U.S.C. §3509(k). 
- 2 - 
EFTA02740425

Case 9:08-cv-80380-KAM Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/10/2008 Page 3 of 4 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
I hereby certify that on July 10, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the 
Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day 
to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices 
of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who 
are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing. 
Is/ Adam D. Horowitz 
- 3 - 
EFTA02740426

Case 9:08-cv-80380-KAM Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/10/2008 Page 4 of 4 
SERVICE LIST 
DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN 
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/ 
United States District Court, Southern District of Florida 
Jack Alan Goldberger 
[Email Redacted] 
Michael R. Tein 
[Email Redacted] 
/s/ Adam D. Horowitz 
- 4 - 
EFTA02740427
← EFTA02740423Court RecordsEFTA02740428 →