← EFTA02734959Court RecordsEFTA02735066 →

EFTA02735064

Court Records

Extracted Text #

Filing # 165889453 E-Filed 02/01/2023 10:24:49 AM 
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 
FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN 
AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, 
FLORIDA 
CA FLORIDA HOLDINGS, LLC, CASE NO.: 50-2019-CA-014681-AG 
Publisher of THE PALM BEACH POST, 
Plaintiff, 
v. 
DAVE ARONBERG, as State Attorney of 
Palm Beach County, Florida; SHARON R. 
BOCK, as Clerk and Comptroller of Palm 
Beach County, Florida, 
Defendants. 
ORDER DENYING THE AM 1ASe AC)
T TSM  N
FOR 
ATTORNEYS' FEES UNDER FLO SECTION 57.105 TU °TE 
CO SA
\ THIS CAUSE having come before urt September 6 and 8, 2022 on State Attorney 
Dave Aronberg's November 9, 2020 otion for Attorneys' Fees Under Florida Statutes 
Section 57.105, and the Court h g wed the Amended Motion, the evidence presented, and 
arguments of counsel, and being  d rwise fully and duly advised in the premises, it is hereby, 
ORDERED D UDGED as follows: 
I. e 7 Itorney Dave Aronberg's November 9, 2020 Amended Motion for 
Attorneys 
DENIED. 
2. Under Florida Statutes Section 57.105, a court may award reasonable attorneys' 
fees only if "the court finds that the losing party or the losing party's attorney knew or should have 
known that a claim or defense when initially presented to the court or at any time before trial: 
(a) Was not supported by the material facts necessary to establish the claim or defense; or 
der Florida Statutes Section 57.105 (the "Amended Motion") is hereby 
FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY. FL, ABRUZZO. CLERK. 02/01/2023 10:24:49 AM 
EFTA02735064

(b) Would not be supported by the application of then-existing law to those material facts." Fla. 
Stat. § 57.105(1). 
3. The Court heard the testimony of the parties and finds the testimony of Mr. 
Aronberg reliable and credible, and resolves the conflicts in the testimony in favor of Mr. 
Aronberg; however, the "Amended Motion" is the only motion for fees that was set for hearing, 
and for reasons stated below Mr. Aronberg's motion is denied - solely on procedut7t punds. 
4. The Amended Motion did not comply with the strict "safe h ice provision 
of section 57.105(4), which requires the motion to be served on the n- party at least 21 
days before it is filed. 
5. The Court must deny the Amended Motio /Liberty Express, Inc., 252 So. 
ti3d at 403 ("[1]n order to have properly complied wi 'c , 7.105, [the filing party] must have 
Sfirst served the proposed motion upon the p ; s i t to sanction": "The primary purpose of e
section 57.105's safe harbor provision is row the recipient of the motion with notice and the 
opportunity to withdraw or abando *v s claim before sanctions are sought."). 
6. Accordingly, th 020 Motion for Attorneys' Fees is DENIED. 
DONE AND O in at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida 
sozotocaopt 
O ?Si  
502019CAOI4681XXXXM8 Oli31 202 
axycNg r a y2123 , C UIT 
•O'r  Luis D gar Chicoil Judge 
Lads Delgado 
Ora Jae 
cc: All counsel of record 
2 
EFTA02735065
← EFTA02734959Court RecordsEFTA02735066 →